A federal judge in Massachusetts sustained a claim versus a Jeep maker, holding ordinary statement mentioned throughout deposition sufficed to describe supposed automobile problems and professional statement wasn’t needed to support triable claims regarding whether the automobile was harmed on shipment.
The supposed problems, consisting of missing out on paint, paint drips, overspray, misaligned body panels, and burn marks were “uncomplicated and observable conditions” that the were adequately discussed by ordinary statement, held U.S. District Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV for the District of Massachusetts, in a Nov. 30 viewpoint